DEATH IS A DEPARTURE
The greatest reason the apostle believed in life after death
was his never to be forgotten encounter with the risen Lord Jesus Christ
as he was on his way to arrest and imprison followers of Jesus Christ
by Geoff Thomas
Paul saw death as a 'departure' (Philippians 1:23). He does not see death as
annihilation. He cannot envisage himself crying on his deathbed, "Out
brief candle!" and in the twinkling of an eye ceasing to exist. Death
is not someone being snuffed out. "I desire to depart," says
Paul. The word is used of soldiers striking camp, packing up their 'earthly
tents' and moving on to their final destination. They once were staying
at that spot, but now they have gone - somewhere else. It is not that
they have ceased to exist. The word 'depart' conveys the idea of leaving
something permanently behind. "We can see this most clearly in the
military operations of the Roman army. Whenever a party of Roman soldiers
reached the end of a long day's march they made a camp. This was no ordinary
camp constructed out of a few tents and several fires. A Roman camp, even
when the legion was under pressed marches, was always an elaborate affair.
First, a rectangle was paced off, large enough to hold the contingent
of soldiers. The troops occupied assigned places within the encampment.
After the rectangle was paced out the entire encampment was secured by
moat and rampart, often to a combined height of ten or twelve feet. The
top was reinforced and the corners were strengthened. After this the soldiers
settled down for rest and for their evening meal. In a day or two the
camp was struck, and the soldiers moved on. Behind lay the camp with all
its fortifications like a discarded chrysalis, mute testimony to the fact
that they had been there. Paul suggests that in a similar way Christians
break camp to be with Jesus, while all that is not useful lies behind
- all of the sin, all of the pain, all of the care and anguish of this
world" (James Montgomery Boice, "Philippians," Baker Books,
1971, p.82). So Paul's longing was to 'depart' from this uncertain earthly
pilgrimage to his home: "Man goeth to his everlasting home"
(Eccles. 12:5).
From whence did Paul get these ideas of immortality? From the Word of
God. For example, in the very first book of Moses, Genesis, we are introduced
to Enoch, and we are told, "and Enoch walked with God: and he was
not; for God took him" (Gen. 5:24). It is not recorded that God annihilated
Enoch so that he ceased to exist, but that he was not on the earth one
day longer. An old time Welsh preacher would put it like this: "Here
was this man, Enoch, walking with God. Every day he would go and look
for God, and they would have a walk together. And then God would say,
'Well, I must leave you now; you go home and sleep. Get up in the morning
and do your work and I will look out for you again tomorrow.
"This was the life that Enoch lived [said the preacher]. This was
his greatest delight. Enoch had his work to do, of course, but he always
looked for the times when he could give himself utterly and absolutely
to taking a walk with God and enjoying his companionship. He had been
enjoying this every day, as we are told in the record, for several hundred
years. Then one day he finished his work and went as usual to the meeting-place
where God was waiting for him, and they walked together, and it was wonderful.
God had never been so loving, he had never been so kind, and Enoch had
never been so happy.
"The time came, the usual time, for God to say, 'Very well, I must
leave it at that for today, and we will meet again tomorrow.' But on this
occasion God didn't say that. He said, 'Enoch, we have been doing this
together now for so long. You enjoy it; I enjoy it. Tonight, I'm not going
to say to you, "Go home and rest and sleep and get up and do your
work and look for me tomorrow. Enoch," he said, "don't go home.
Come with me." So God took him and he was not. God took him to his
everlasting habitation. The perpetual fellowship was to be absolute. There
was never to be another break or another intermission" (quoted Dr
D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, "Heirs of Salvation," Bryntirion Press,
2000, pp.44 & 45). Enoch departed to be with the Lord.
When King David's baby son died the heart-broken king cried, "I
will go to him, but he will not return to me" (2 Sam. 12:23). David
departed to be with his son. The Lord Jesus tells us that the living God
identifies himself as 'the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob' (Matt. 23:32).
The bodies of those patriarchs were buried and had turned to dust, but
those men as to their spirits, were in the presence of the God of the
living. "I will always be their God," says the Lord. The heroes
of faith of Hebrews 11 considered themselves 'strangers and pilgrims on
the earth.' One day they were going to depart for the heavenly country
that God had prepared for them (Hebs. 11:13-16). The body dies, but the
spirit survives and departs to be with Christ. It departs this world and
joins the vast company of "the spirits of just men made perfect"
(Hebs. 12:23). So Paul believed in immortality from the plain teaching
of the Scriptures. Death for him consisted of departing. This old tentmaker
from Tarsus would one day pack up his own earthly tent for the final time
and move on to his permanent home, the mansions that the Lord was preparing
for him.
When the former president of the USA, John Quincy Adams, was in his eightieth
year and walking slowly along a Boston street he met a friend. "How
is John Quincy Adams today?" he friend asked. He replied, "Thank
you, John Quincy Adams is well, sir, quite well, I thank you. But the
house in which he lives at present is becoming dilapidated. It is tottering
upon the foundations. Time and the seasons have nearly destroyed it. Its
roof is pretty well worn out, its walls are shattered, and it trembles
with every wind. The old tenement is becoming uninhabitable, and I think
John Quincy Adams will have to move out of it soon; but he himself is
quite well, sir, quite well." And with that the old man continued
walking slowly down the street.
The greatest reason the apostle believed in life after death was his
never to be forgotten encounter with the risen Lord Jesus Christ as he
was on his way to arrest and imprison followers of Jesus Christ. This
is how he recounts the incident to King Agrippa: "On one of these
journeys I was going to Damascus with the authority and commission of
the chief priests. About noon, O king, as I was on the road, I saw a light
from heaven, brighter than the sun, blazing around me and my companions.
We all fell to the ground, and I heard a voice saying to me in Aramaic,
'Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me? It is hard for you to kick against
the goads.' Then I asked, 'Who are you, Lord?' 'I am Jesus, whom you are
persecuting,' the Lord said. 'Now get up and stand on your feet. I have
appeared to you to appoint you as a servant and as a witness of what you
have seen of me and what I will show you" (Acts 26:12-16).
Now it is the easiest response for men of the world to slip into unconsidered
and automatic amateur psychiatry in dismissing this incident and talk
of "the pressures of guilt in Paul", and a "vivid imagination",
and "the heat and light of the sun causing the apostle to see things".
But there is one factor in particular that you must consider if you are
tempted to judge like that. Paul recounts this story three times in the
Acts of the Apostles, and on all three occasions he tells us that everybody
in his group on the road going to Damascus saw the glorious heavenly light,
"blazing around me and my companions. We all fell to the ground"
(Acts 26:13&14); "The men travelling with Saul stood there speechless;
they heard the sound but did not see anyone" (Acts 9:7); "My
companions saw the light, but they did not understand the voice of him
who was speaking to me" (Acts 22:9). They all saw the light, they
all fell to the ground, when they got to their feet they were all speechless,
they all had heard the sound of the voice, but could not see Jesus nor
understand what he was saying. That was given to Saul alone. The Holy
Spirit did not give that particular revelation to the others. Like the
initial sight of Jesus by the two men on the road to Emmaus, "they
were kept from recognizing him" (Lk. 24:16).
So Paul's conversion cannot be dismissed as some intense private experience
of a guilt-ridden man. This experience was sudden, public, corporate and
observed by many others who were utterly overwhelmed by what they saw,
though certain aspects of it were hidden from them. The consequence for
Paul was a revolution of thought and value. He experienced a moral transformation,
and for the rest of his life he lived a modest holy life telling people
exactly the same message Peter and John and the other apostles told them,
that Christ was the Lamb of God who had died for our sins to be forgiven,
and on the third day he had risen from the dead, and hundreds of people
had seen Jesus alive talking, eating and drinking with him. That was another
unanswerable reason Paul opposed any idea that at death we pass into non-existence.
His Saviour Christ had risen from the grave. Jesus is more powerful than
death! That is the gospel. So death is a setting out, a departure for
another destination.
GEOFF THOMAS
|